<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sinceWEN - by Kristy Wen &#187; riot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sincewen.com/tag/riot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sincewen.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T a la China&#8230; But Worse.</title>
		<link>http://sincewen.com/att-a-la-china-but-worse/</link>
		<comments>http://sincewen.com/att-a-la-china-but-worse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristy Wen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sincewen.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About, oh, 1000x worse. Okay, so we&#8217;re used to China and their constant censorship of US darlings like Google Apps, Youtube, whatnot and what have you. By now, it&#8217;s actually alarming if one of our social media sites isn&#8217;t being censored by the Great Firewall (let&#8217;s call that the GFW from now on, a la [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About, oh, 1000x worse. Okay, so we&#8217;re used to China and their constant censorship of US darlings like Google Apps, Youtube, whatnot and what have you. By now, it&#8217;s actually alarming if one of our social media sites <i>isn&#8217;t</i> being censored by the Great Firewall (let&#8217;s call that the GFW from now on, a la the lovely Twitter hashtag <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23FuckGFW" alt="Twitter Hashtag FuckGFW">#FuckGFW</a>). </p>
<p>Apparently, AT&#038;T has decided to <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/26/att-blocks-4chan-this-is-going-to-get-ugly/" alt="AT&#038;T Blocks 4chan This is Going to Get Ugly">block 4chan</a>. 4chan. Let&#8217;s say that again &#8211; 4chan. Of all the sites they could have censored, 4chan? Really? <i>Really?</i> Did they not see what 4chan did with TIME&#8217;s 100 Most Influential People list? And TIME didn&#8217;t even <i>do</i> anything to them. AT&#038;T&#8217;s got some real cajones if they&#8217;re willing to take on the wrath of 4chan, which of course, comes bundled with the army of <a href="http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Anon" alt="Anon">anon</a>. You just don&#8217;t <i>mess</i> with 4chan, unless you want your homepage to start displaying 2girls1cup or meatspin- and that&#8217;s only the start of it.</p>
<p>As per TechCrunch:</p>
<blockquote><p>AT&#038;T has just opened perhaps the most vindictive, messy can of worms it could have possibly found. Blocking any site seems like a breach of user trust, but the decision to block 4chan in particular just seems stupid. Expect the web equivalent of rioting if this doesn’t change soon. &#8211; Jason Kincaid</p></blockquote>
<p>The troops have already begun rallying <a href="http://s6.invisionfree.com/ProjectATT/index.php" alt="Project AT&#038;T">here</a> and on <a href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/AT%26T_Blocks_4chan" alt="EA AT&#038;T Blocks 4chan">Encyclopedia Dramatica</a>. I don&#8217;t know about you, but I&#8217;m stocking up on my popcorn. Unless 4chan decides to blow up AT&#038;T&#8217;s servers, in which I will be /wrist, because sadly, my service provider is AT&#038;T.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/AT%26T_Blocks_4chan" alt="EA AT&#038;T Blocks 4chan">Encyclopaedia Dramatica</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>This isn&#8217;t like going to war with Anontalk, or Scientology, or some website, it&#8217;s AT&#038; fucking T. There will be no lulz in this war.<br />
This time the internet IS serious business.</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://sincewen.com/images/4chan_godhelpus_480.jpg" alt="4chan God Help Us If They Ever Assemble" /></p>
<p><span id="more-95"></span><br />
EDIT: Seems like AT&#038;T already gave up &#8211; /b/ is accessible again (I double checked). Damn, I was so looking forward to the epic intarwebz battle. But! There&#8217;s still <a href="http://encyclopediadramatica.com/AT%26T_Blocks_4chan" alt="EA">hope yet</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It appears that AT&#038;T has STOPPED blocking access to img.4chan.org in multiple previously affected areas! </p>
<p>(as soon as they get a little shitstorm, they back down &#8212; will this story end here? do we say &#8216;oh ok thanks for unblocking&#8217; or do we go on?)</p>
<p><b>We go on. Anonymous does not forgive. Anonymous does not forget.</b> &#8211; Anon,</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://sincewen.com/images/480px-AnonymousBecause.jpg" alt="Anon" /></p>
<p>EDIT Numero Dos: AT&#038;T released a statement earlier today, explaining how all this went down in the first place.</p>
<blockquote><p>Beginning Friday, an AT&#038;T customer was impacted by a denial-of-service attack stemming from IP addresses connected to img.4chan.org. To prevent this attack from disrupting service for the impacted AT&#038;T customer, and to prevent the attack from spreading to impact our other customers, AT&#038;T temporarily blocked access to the IP addresses in question for our customers. This action was in no way related to the content at img.4chan.org; our focus was on protecting our customers from malicious traffic.</p>
<p>Overnight Sunday, after we determined the denial-of-service threat no longer existed, AT&#038;T removed the block on the IP addresses in question. We will continue to monitor for denial-of-service activity and any malicious traffic to protect our customers.</p></blockquote>
<p>And a response from moot, via his <a href="http://status.4chan.org/index.html#2174049422947602936" alt="4chan Status Blog">status blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Here’s what happened:</p>
<p>For the past three weeks, 4chan has been under a constant DDoS attack. We were able to filter this specific type of attack in a fashion that was more or less transparent to the end user.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, as an unintended consequence of the method used, some Internet users received errant traffic from one of our network switches. A handful happened to be AT&#038;T customers.</p>
<p>In response, AT&#038;T filtered all traffic to and from our img.4chan.org IPs (which serve /b/ &#038; /r9k/) for their entire network, instead of only the affected customers. AT&#038;T did not contact us prior to implementing the block. Here is their statement regarding the matter.</p>
<p>In the end, this wasn’t a sinister act of censorship, but rather a bit of a mistake and a poorly executed, disproportionate response on AT&#038;T’s part. Whoever pulled the trigger on blackholing the site probably didn’t anticipate [nor intend] the consequences of doing so.</p>
<p>We’re glad to see this short-lived debacle has prompted renewed interest and debate over net neutrality and internet censorship—two very important issues that don’t get nearly enough attention—so perhaps this was all just a blessing in disguise.</p>
<p>Aside from that, I’ll also add that there is some big news due later this week. Keep an eye on the News page, Twitter, and global message for updates.</p>
<p>As always, I can be reached at moot@4chan.org.</p>
<p>—</p>
<p>PS: If any companies would like to hook us up with some better hardware, feel free! The architecture we’ve got powering this large and influential beast is really quite embarrassing. ( ._.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Like moot wrote, this srsly was a badly executed &#8220;solution&#8221; on AT&#038;T&#8217;s part. They should at least warn people or have a posted alert saying that they&#8217;re going to block any site or IP for a good majority of the customers. Not to mention, one that has a high volume of traffic, like 4chan or any media site. </p>
<p>Ah well, I guess we&#8217;ll have to keep waiting to witness an epic internet throwdown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sincewen.com/att-a-la-china-but-worse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
